Loading

Is a backbencher child not academically gifted?

A group of backbencher children in a classroom.

The classroom is alive with activity: a teacher at the front explaining an algebraic formula, while in the back of the room, a child sits quietly. Often unnoticed, this student isn’t raising his hand or engaging in the lesson—perhaps doodling in the margins of his notebook or gazing out the window. The term “backbencher” often carries certain stereotypes—uninterested, disengaged, or not academically gifted. But is that really the case? Every class has students who, by choice or circumstance, find themselves sitting at the back. Over the years, a myth has emerged that these students aren’t “academically gifted” or simply don’t care about their studies. However, the reality is far more nuanced. Let’s explore why sitting at the back of the classroom doesn’t necessarily determine a child’s academic potential.

What does “Backbencher” really mean?

Let’s first define what is actually meant by “backbencher.” In most schools, these are considered to be students who prefer sitting at the back of the classroom, away from the teacher’s immediate line of vision. While this sometimes leads educators to believe that it represents a certain degree of disinterest, there are several reasons a child might choose to sit in the back. It might be a matter of preference, comfort, or even the aftermath of social dynamics within the classroom. Labelling all backbenchers as underperformers does them an injustice. Place in the classroom doesn’t show intelligence or potential a seat.

Myth 1: Backbenchers lack interest in learning

  • The most common myth is that backbenchers are disengaged from learning. One may easily presume that students who sit in the back aren’t paying attention. After all, they are not the ones contributing or offering the answers. However such assumptions overlook the diversity in learning styles.
  • Many children learn differently. Some children are even introverted and enjoy simply observing, rather than participating. Other children have anxiety issues and may feel more comfortable in the back of the room. Just because a student isn’t front and centre doesn’t mean they aren’t learning.
  • Whereas the quietest are actually the ones with the most inquisitive minds. Maybe these children do better in self-directed learning where they explore at their own pace without feeling at risk.

Myth 2: Backbenchers aren’t academically gifted

Another myth that all backbenchers are less academically gifted compared to their peers seated in the front row is wrong. Intelligence and academic potential pre-determine seating arrangements within the classroom. Successful persons have indeed once been backbenchers.

Albert Einstein was considered a particularly poor student when at school. In fact, his teachers believed that he was not going to attain anything serious on the academic front. Yet this worst student at school went ahead and changed physics. Thomas Edison, the great inventor who perfected the light bulb, was considered a slow learner when he was a kid. Some examples establish the fact that sometimes traditional academic measures are not really reflections of a child’s potential.

Different types of intelligence

The assumption that backbenchers are not academically able is an outcome of a very narrow definition of intelligence. Most people relate intelligence to a high aptitude test score or academic performance, but intelligence wears many faces.

  • Linguistic Intelligence:  The ability to use words effectively as poets, and writers.
  • Logical-Mathematical Intelligence:  Ability to reason and think logically (scientists, mathematicians).
  • Spatial Intelligence: The ability to think in three dimensions as artists, and architects.
  • Musical Intelligence: The ability to perceive or create musical patterns—singers, musicians, composers.
  • Bodily-kinesthetic Intelligence: Skillful use of one’s body; for example, dancers, and athletes.
  • Interpersonal Intelligence: The capability to understand and interact with other people (teachers, counsellors).
  • Intrapersonal Intelligence: the ability of self-reflection- Philosophers, Psychologists.
  • Naturalistic Intelligence: The ability to recognize patterns existing in nature itself is instinctive.

A backbencher might not be bright in regular academics, but he might possess a high degree of creativity, social intelligence, or problem-solving acumen which might not be regularly brought to light in the classroom.

Why do some children sit at the back?

  • First, it is necessary to appreciate why some children may choose or may be put into the back row. Here are but a few of the reasons:
  • Sometimes, children force their peers to sit in a particular part of the class. The shy or anxious child will also keep to the back seat if he doesn’t want to be the centre of attention.
  • Some children are just observers as far as learning is concerned. Such children may want to sit at the back so that they could work on whatever was happening without them being under direct pressure.
  • Some kids do not get so overwhelmed if they are sitting in the back as they would be in front with so much action.
  • Some students feel daunted by always being in the line of sight of the teacher. The back gives a sense of freedom.

How can teachers help backbenchers succeed?

  • Although one should not leap to conclusions regarding their underperformance, the teacher can plan some strategies for ensuring that these backbenchers do not fall behind academically.
  • Teachers should know that students have different ways of learning. The inclusion of various teaching methodologies-visual, auditory, and hands-on is a better way to engage the backbenchers without necessarily having them change their seating preference.
  • Rather than resting their questions among only those students who sit in the front rows, it is always upon the teacher to include even backbenchers for discussions by encouraging open-ended questions or encouraging their participation.
  • Teachers should appreciate the strengths and talents of backbenchers instead of having a deficit way of thinking. Every child does have a special kind of talent, be it creativity, critical thinking, or leadership skills.
  • The backbenchers, in the classroom setting, are partially blocked from view; therefore, teachers should frequently ask them if they understand to confirm if they need any assistance.

Being a backbencher does not make a child less capable in academics or hold any less potential in their future endeavours. Intelligence and success are multi-dimensional, and often the issue of a child sitting behind the class is an issue of preference and not ability. Every child shall get equal rights to learn in the best way that suits them; that has to be understood, too, by both educators and parents: capabilities in academics also come with variations.

So, next time one hears the term “backbencher,” remember, this may be the future Einstein and Edison silently working and soaking it in, just waiting for the right time to bloom.

The question about whether a backbencher child is not gifted academically is one that has aspects to be complex and multi-layered, so it requires a careful reevaluation of our educational perspectives and assumptions. This will create a scope for bringing out the real uniqueness in every student by moving beyond the labels and stereotypes. This new attention on the student enables them to achieve not only academically but also confidence, curiosity, and skill to bring out the best.

At DPS Warangal, we feel that the whole concept of a backbencher child being academically less gifted is a highly complex and sensitive issue that requires a detailed re-evaluation of our educational values and perspectives. Having accepted that everyone has an academic ability in one of the many forms it has, we shall be able to provide a culture wherein all pupils have opportunities to achieve their potential regardless of where they sit in class.